The Motion is DENIED.

Based on the terms of the arbitration agreement, it does apply to the claims at issue and against all parties. However, the agreement is unconscionable both procedurally and substantively. The court finds procedural unconscionability. Procedural unconscionability is generally satisfied if the contract was an adhesion contract. Nyulassy v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1267, 1280-1281, fn. 11. The evidence provided by Defendants appears to indicate that the agreement is a contract of adhesion. Quest’s Senior Director of Human Resource Business Partner states that as part of the new hire paperwork for all, all new hires are given the arbitration agreement to sign. The arbitration agreement has no opt out provision. As such, it appears that all new hires are required to sign the arbitration agreement. Based on this evidence it appears that this agreement is a contract of adhesion. Plaintiff argues that the agreement is also procedurally unconscionable