Judgment Debtor Kevan Gilman (“Gilman”) moves to tax the costs set forth in Judgment Creditors Tammy Phillip’s and Tammy R. Phillips, a Professional Law Corporation’s memoranda of costs, which were filed and mail-served on October 12, 2018. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.
Preliminarily, the Court overrules Judgment Creditors objections to the Declaration of Mark Ellis, which Gilman filed in support of his motion to tax on November 1, 2018. Gilman contends the costs set forth in the memoranda of costs were previously sought, and granted or denied, in the adversary and/or main bankruptcy matter. Gilman argues that, to the extent they were granted, judgment creditors are barred from recovering them here. As to the costs that were denied, judgment creditors have appealed the rulings denying costs. Without any supporting authority, Gilman also asserts fees and costs incurred before the bankruptcy court must be sought in that forum.
The cost memoranda at issue were fil
Hearing Date
December 18, 2018
Type
Contract: Other (37)
Status
Closed Judgment: Court Finding 06/11/2007
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Judgment Debtor Kevan Gilman (“Gilman”) moves to tax the costs set forth in Judgment Creditors Tammy Phillip’s and Tammy R. Phillips, a Professional Law Corporation’s memoranda of costs, which were filed and mail-served on October 12, 2018. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.
Preliminarily, the Court overrules Judgment Creditors objections to the Declaration of Mark Ellis, which Gilman filed in support of his motion to tax on November 1, 2018. Gilman contends the costs set forth in the memoranda of costs were previously sought, and granted or denied, in the adversary and/or main bankruptcy matter. Gilman argues that, to the extent they were granted, judgment creditors are barred from recovering them here. As to the costs that were denied, judgment creditors have appealed the rulings denying costs. Without any supporting authority, Gilman also asserts fees and costs incurred before the bankruptcy court must be sought in that forum.
The cost memoranda at issue were fil