The Court denies the motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum made by Mikhail Geftar. The Court grants the motion’s request for a protective order as follows: Examination and production of documents shall be limited to the sources of monies used to purchase what the motion and response refer to as the Dorlan Property. Mr. Geftar purchased this property, apparently for cash, at a time when monies over which the debtors had control were being transferred in large amounts. It can be reasonably concluded that at or near the time of the purchase, Debtor Deanna Azrilyan and Mr. Geftar were both living at the Dorlan Property, and apparently both still live there. Mr. Geftar shall produce documents requested by items 1, 3, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 23, and 24. Mr. Geftar has not made any factual showing to contravene the inferences that may be drawn from Plaintiff’s documents. Requests for sanctions are denied.

.....