Re: Timothy Cox v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., et al. (KC068943)
MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE
Moving Party: Plaintiff Timothy Cox
Respondents: Defendants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., et al.
POS: Moving OK; Opposing served by regular mail contrary to CCP § 1005(c); Reply timely only for the 11/28/17 continued hearing date
Plaintiff alleges that, following his complaints to management relating to various Labor Code and FEHA violations, he was reprimanded, demoted and ultimately terminated. The complaint was filed 12/22/16. The First Amended Complaint, filed 12/27/16, asserts causes of action against Defendants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., Reynolds American, Inc., Tasha Kolbe, Staci Meyer and Does 1-50 for:
On 2/15/17, the case was removed to federal court. On 6/8/17, an “Order re Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for an Order to Dismiss Federal Claims and Remand State Claim
Hearing Date
November 28, 2017
Type
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Removed to Federal Court 05/11/2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Re: Timothy Cox v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., et al. (KC068943)
MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE
Moving Party: Plaintiff Timothy Cox
Respondents: Defendants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., et al.
POS: Moving OK; Opposing served by regular mail contrary to CCP § 1005(c); Reply timely only for the 11/28/17 continued hearing date
Plaintiff alleges that, following his complaints to management relating to various Labor Code and FEHA violations, he was reprimanded, demoted and ultimately terminated. The complaint was filed 12/22/16. The First Amended Complaint, filed 12/27/16, asserts causes of action against Defendants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., Reynolds American, Inc., Tasha Kolbe, Staci Meyer and Does 1-50 for:
On 2/15/17, the case was removed to federal court. On 6/8/17, an “Order re Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for an Order to Dismiss Federal Claims and Remand State Claim