Re: Jackie Calvin, et al. v. Edward Mugica, et al. (KC067619)
MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
Moving Parties: Defendants Joe Hernandez and Solo 1 Kustoms, Inc.
Respondents: Plaintiffs Jackie Calvin, Eddie Calvin, Albert Hinojos, Luis Manuel Rios Ciriaco and Armando Vasquez
POS: Moving OK; Opposing untimely per CCP § 659a
This action arises out of agreements wherein defendants agreed to repair and customize plaintiffs’ automobiles. Plaintiffs allege that they each paid defendants in advance for the repairs, and defendants demanded additional payments after disassembling plaintiffs’ vehicles and threatened the sale of plaintiffs’ vehicles at lien sales if they did not pay. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants removed items from their vehicles and sold the items, and that defendants failed to use quality parts as promised. Plaintiffs commenced this action on 5/5/15. The First Amended Complaint was filed on 5/13/15. The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), filed on 10/1/15, asserts causes of act
Hearing Date
March 24, 2017
Type
Other Commercial/Business Tort (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Judgment by Court 12/07/2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Re: Jackie Calvin, et al. v. Edward Mugica, et al. (KC067619)
MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
Moving Parties: Defendants Joe Hernandez and Solo 1 Kustoms, Inc.
Respondents: Plaintiffs Jackie Calvin, Eddie Calvin, Albert Hinojos, Luis Manuel Rios Ciriaco and Armando Vasquez
POS: Moving OK; Opposing untimely per CCP § 659a
This action arises out of agreements wherein defendants agreed to repair and customize plaintiffs’ automobiles. Plaintiffs allege that they each paid defendants in advance for the repairs, and defendants demanded additional payments after disassembling plaintiffs’ vehicles and threatened the sale of plaintiffs’ vehicles at lien sales if they did not pay. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants removed items from their vehicles and sold the items, and that defendants failed to use quality parts as promised. Plaintiffs commenced this action on 5/5/15. The First Amended Complaint was filed on 5/13/15. The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), filed on 10/1/15, asserts causes of act