TENTATIVE RULING
Calendar: 11
Date: 9/25/2020
Case No: EC 068370 Trial Date: None Set
Case Name: Grigorian v. Megeredchian, et al.
DISCOVERY MOTIONS (2 Motions)
Moving Party: Defendants Alex Megeredchian, Megeredchian Law, and Law Offices of Alex Megeredchian (Compel Responses Interrogs)
Plaintiff Vehanoosh Grigorian (Compel Compliance Deposition Subpoenas)
Responding Party: Plaintiff Vehanoosh Grigorian (Compel ResponsesInterrogs)
Third party Meghedy Bandary
Third party Robert Ter-Oganesyan (Compel Compliance Deposition Subpoenas) (No Opposition)
RELIEF REQUESTED:
Responses to Specially Prepared Interrogatories, Set No. One from plaintiff
Order Compelling Compliance with Subpoena for Attendance and Testimony by Robert Ter-Oganesyan
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND:
Plaintiff Vehanoosh Grigorian brings this legal malpractice action against her former attorneys, defendants Alex Megeredchian and his law practice entities, alleging that during their representation of plain
Hearing Date
September 25, 2020
Type
Legal Malpractice (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
TENTATIVE RULING
Calendar: 11
Date: 9/25/2020
Case No: EC 068370 Trial Date: None Set
Case Name: Grigorian v. Megeredchian, et al.
DISCOVERY MOTIONS (2 Motions)
Moving Party: Defendants Alex Megeredchian, Megeredchian Law, and Law Offices of Alex Megeredchian (Compel Responses Interrogs)
Plaintiff Vehanoosh Grigorian (Compel Compliance Deposition Subpoenas)
Responding Party: Plaintiff Vehanoosh Grigorian (Compel ResponsesInterrogs)
Third party Meghedy Bandary
Third party Robert Ter-Oganesyan (Compel Compliance Deposition Subpoenas) (No Opposition)
RELIEF REQUESTED:
Responses to Specially Prepared Interrogatories, Set No. One from plaintiff
Order Compelling Compliance with Subpoena for Attendance and Testimony by Robert Ter-Oganesyan
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND:
Plaintiff Vehanoosh Grigorian brings this legal malpractice action against her former attorneys, defendants Alex Megeredchian and his law practice entities, alleging that during their representation of plain