Cruise Worldwide, Ltd. v Chin
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO CCP §413.10
Calendar: 12 Case No: EC067255 Hearing Date: 4/19/19
Action Filed: 9/5/17 Trial: Not set
MP: Plaintiffs Cruise Worldwide, Ltd. and Teresa Lu
RP: Defendants Michael Lin and RC Cruises International Co., Ltd.
ALLEGATIONS:
In this action, Plaintiffs Cruise Worldwide, Ltd. and Teresa Lu allege that they are in the business of selling cruise packages by Royal Caribbean and served as Royal Caribbean’s International Representative in Taiwan. Plaintiffs partnered with Defendants Michael Lin and RC Cruises International Co., Ltd., and in April 2017, Lin asked Plaintiffs for a larger share of Cruise Worldwide’s gross profits, which Lu declined. Plaintiffs allege, thereafter, Lin engaged in a scheme to steal the company, renamed his company “Cruise Worldwide RC” to create confusion in the marketplace and mislead Plaintiffs’ customers, engaged in a smear campaign against Plaintiffs, and caused Royal C
Hearing Date
April 19, 2019
Type
Defamation (Slander/Libel) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Cruise Worldwide, Ltd. v Chin
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO CCP §413.10
Calendar: 12 Case No: EC067255 Hearing Date: 4/19/19
Action Filed: 9/5/17 Trial: Not set
MP: Plaintiffs Cruise Worldwide, Ltd. and Teresa Lu
RP: Defendants Michael Lin and RC Cruises International Co., Ltd.
ALLEGATIONS:
In this action, Plaintiffs Cruise Worldwide, Ltd. and Teresa Lu allege that they are in the business of selling cruise packages by Royal Caribbean and served as Royal Caribbean’s International Representative in Taiwan. Plaintiffs partnered with Defendants Michael Lin and RC Cruises International Co., Ltd., and in April 2017, Lin asked Plaintiffs for a larger share of Cruise Worldwide’s gross profits, which Lu declined. Plaintiffs allege, thereafter, Lin engaged in a scheme to steal the company, renamed his company “Cruise Worldwide RC” to create confusion in the marketplace and mislead Plaintiffs’ customers, engaged in a smear campaign against Plaintiffs, and caused Royal C