TENTATIVE RULING
EARLY EVALUATION CONFERENCE
[Civil Code §55.54.]
Calendar: 9
Date: 6/9/17
Case No.: EC 066410
Case Name: Cabrera v. Einstein and Noah Corp.
Moving Party: Defendant Einstein and Noah Corp.
Responding Party: Plaintiff Gabriala Cabrera
RULING:
Conduct Early Evaluation Conference.
RELIEF REQUESTED:
High frequency litigant disclosures
Payment of high frequency litigant filing fee
SUMMARY OF FACTS:
Plaintiff Gabriela Cabrera alleges that at all times mentioned she could not walk and was confined to a wheelchair, and that while patronizing public accommodations, a restaurant in Burbank operated by defendant Einstein and Noah Corp., plaintiff encountered an architectural barrier within the facility in the form of a straw and lid dispenser which she was unable to reach, as the dispensers were placed out of plaintiff’s reach and the countertop on which they were located did not provide the proper knee clearance. Plaintiff alleges that defendant has violated the Am
Hearing Date
June 09, 2017
Type
Civil Rights (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
TENTATIVE RULING
EARLY EVALUATION CONFERENCE
[Civil Code §55.54.]
Calendar: 9
Date: 6/9/17
Case No.: EC 066410
Case Name: Cabrera v. Einstein and Noah Corp.
Moving Party: Defendant Einstein and Noah Corp.
Responding Party: Plaintiff Gabriala Cabrera
RULING:
Conduct Early Evaluation Conference.
RELIEF REQUESTED:
High frequency litigant disclosures
Payment of high frequency litigant filing fee
SUMMARY OF FACTS:
Plaintiff Gabriela Cabrera alleges that at all times mentioned she could not walk and was confined to a wheelchair, and that while patronizing public accommodations, a restaurant in Burbank operated by defendant Einstein and Noah Corp., plaintiff encountered an architectural barrier within the facility in the form of a straw and lid dispenser which she was unable to reach, as the dispensers were placed out of plaintiff’s reach and the countertop on which they were located did not provide the proper knee clearance. Plaintiff alleges that defendant has violated the Am