Case Number:
EC065533
Hearing Date:
January 15, 2021
Dept:
E
MOTION TO QUASH DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, GRANT A PROTECTIVE ORDER
Date: 1/15/21 (2:00 PM)
Case:
Edwin Minassian v. Michael Panosian et al.
(EC065533)
TENTATIVE RULING
:
Defendants Michael Panosian and Toughbuilt Industries, Inc.’s Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas, or in the Alternative, Grant a Protective Order is GRANTED.
Defendants move to quash deposition subpoenas to third parties Katsiaryna Sharapa, Linda Moossaian, Edwin Moossaian, Martin Galstyan, and Zareh Khacahtourian, or in the alternative, for a protective order.
Plaintiff contends that a motion to quash can only be based on technical defects in the subpoenas and not on grounds of relevance or undue burden.
(Opp. at 6-7.)
Because CCP § 1987.1 all
Hearing Date
January 15, 2021
Type
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Case Number:
EC065533
Hearing Date:
January 15, 2021
Dept:
E
MOTION TO QUASH DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, GRANT A PROTECTIVE ORDER
Date: 1/15/21 (2:00 PM)
Case:
Edwin Minassian v. Michael Panosian et al.
(EC065533)
TENTATIVE RULING
:
Defendants Michael Panosian and Toughbuilt Industries, Inc.’s Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas, or in the Alternative, Grant a Protective Order is GRANTED.
Defendants move to quash deposition subpoenas to third parties Katsiaryna Sharapa, Linda Moossaian, Edwin Moossaian, Martin Galstyan, and Zareh Khacahtourian, or in the alternative, for a protective order.
Plaintiff contends that a motion to quash can only be based on technical defects in the subpoenas and not on grounds of relevance or undue burden.
(Opp. at 6-7.)
Because CCP § 1987.1 all