Defendants The Regents of the University of California and Scott Katzman, DVM’s motion for
summary judgment/summary adjudication is CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to be
heard on August 9, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 12.
By no later than July 26, 2018, each party shall brief the following issue:
Plaintiff Janet Labarre alleges multiple acts of veterinary malpractice, that defendants failed to
seek informed consent and recommended surgery without determining an actual diagnosis
requiring surgery, recommended a surgery inappropriate for the conditions found, and not taking
appropriate remedial steps when it was apparent that the initial surgery failed. (Third Amended
Complaint, ¶ 28.) Should the timeliness of plaintiff’s complaint be determined with respect to
each individual act of alleged malpractice such that any lack of timeliness with respect to
discovery of one act of wrongdoing does not bar a finding of timeliness with respect to any other
act of malpractice? Alternativel
Hearing Date
July 12, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Defendants The Regents of the University of California and Scott Katzman, DVM’s motion for
summary judgment/summary adjudication is CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to be
heard on August 9, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 12.
By no later than July 26, 2018, each party shall brief the following issue:
Plaintiff Janet Labarre alleges multiple acts of veterinary malpractice, that defendants failed to
seek informed consent and recommended surgery without determining an actual diagnosis
requiring surgery, recommended a surgery inappropriate for the conditions found, and not taking
appropriate remedial steps when it was apparent that the initial surgery failed. (Third Amended
Complaint, ¶ 28.) Should the timeliness of plaintiff’s complaint be determined with respect to
each individual act of alleged malpractice such that any lack of timeliness with respect to
discovery of one act of wrongdoing does not bar a finding of timeliness with respect to any other
act of malpractice? Alternativel