Construction Co.
Defendant Howard S. Wright Construction Co.’s (“HSW”) request for judicial notice is
GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
The Court declines to rule on objections directed to statements made in each parties’ separate
statements of undisputed facts. (HSW’s Objections nos. 1-8; the Regents of the University of
California’s Objections nos. 1-2.) These objections are not framed as objections to evidence, but
instead to individual undisputed material facts. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b).)
The Regents of the University of California’s (“Regents”) evidentiary objections to the
declaration of Joseph Odom are OVERRULED. (Evid. Code, §§ 352, 702, 1200, 1400.)
The Court declines to rule on the Regents’ remaining objections and HSW’s objections as they
are immaterial to the disposition of HSW’s motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (q).)
HSW’s motion for summary adjudication as to the first cause of action for breach of construction
contract, second cau