NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION — FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DWANA BAIN [PLTF] JUDITH GOTTESMAN
RULl'NG
The court grants Plaintiff‘s unopposed motion for sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 in the amount of $4200. (Code Civ. Proc. §128.5(t)(2).)
Trial in this matter commenced on July 20, 2020 and concluded on July 24, 2020. (See Register of Actions “ROA” 7/20/20.) On October 19, 2020, this Court issued its statement of decision and judgment for Plaintiff. (ROA 10/ 19/20.) The statement of decision and judgment were served by the clerk on all parties by mail on October 20, 2020, (ROA 10/20/20.)
Defendant filed her notice of intention to move for a new trial on January 5, 2021 and was given a March 24, 2021 hearing date.1 On January 11, 2021, Defendant filed her memorandum of points and authorities in support of her motion for new trial along with evidence in support of the same. After a hearing on March 24, 2021, this Court denied Defendant‘s motion for a new trial ba
Hearing Date
May 19, 2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION — FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DWANA BAIN [PLTF] JUDITH GOTTESMAN
RULl'NG
The court grants Plaintiff‘s unopposed motion for sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 in the amount of $4200. (Code Civ. Proc. §128.5(t)(2).)
Trial in this matter commenced on July 20, 2020 and concluded on July 24, 2020. (See Register of Actions “ROA” 7/20/20.) On October 19, 2020, this Court issued its statement of decision and judgment for Plaintiff. (ROA 10/ 19/20.) The statement of decision and judgment were served by the clerk on all parties by mail on October 20, 2020, (ROA 10/20/20.)
Defendant filed her notice of intention to move for a new trial on January 5, 2021 and was given a March 24, 2021 hearing date.1 On January 11, 2021, Defendant filed her memorandum of points and authorities in support of her motion for new trial along with evidence in support of the same. After a hearing on March 24, 2021, this Court denied Defendant‘s motion for a new trial ba