Glenn N. Ledesma v. Medical Board of California
Judge Mary Strobel
Hearing: December 4, 2018
BS158002
Tentative Decision on Motion to Compel Response to Requests for Production of Documents: DENIED
Petitioner Glenn N. Ledesma (“Petitioner”) moves to compel Respondent Medical Board of California (“Board” or “Respondent”) to serve a response to “the moving party’s designation’s Requests for Production of Documents, Exhibit A” which Petitioner claims was served on Board in early 2016. Petitioner also seeks sanctions.
Statement of the Case
In his verified petition, Petitioner alleges that the Board’s decision to revoke his medical license was improper because not supported by the evidence and contrary to law. Petitioner also alleges that the ALJ’s decision was affected by cognitive bias.
Procedural History
On September 30, 2015, Petitioner filed a verified petition for writ of administrative mandate. On October 30, 2015 Respondent filed a return to the petition. On May 26, 2016 th
Hearing Date
December 04, 2018
Type
Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Glenn N. Ledesma v. Medical Board of California
Judge Mary Strobel
Hearing: December 4, 2018
BS158002
Tentative Decision on Motion to Compel Response to Requests for Production of Documents: DENIED
Petitioner Glenn N. Ledesma (“Petitioner”) moves to compel Respondent Medical Board of California (“Board” or “Respondent”) to serve a response to “the moving party’s designation’s Requests for Production of Documents, Exhibit A” which Petitioner claims was served on Board in early 2016. Petitioner also seeks sanctions.
Statement of the Case
In his verified petition, Petitioner alleges that the Board’s decision to revoke his medical license was improper because not supported by the evidence and contrary to law. Petitioner also alleges that the ALJ’s decision was affected by cognitive bias.
Procedural History
On September 30, 2015, Petitioner filed a verified petition for writ of administrative mandate. On October 30, 2015 Respondent filed a return to the petition. On May 26, 2016 th