Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 36
SANDRA BERNAL, Plaintiff, v. ARCONIC VALLEY-TODECO, INC., et al., Defendants.
Case No.: BC721408
Hearing Date: 7/1/2020
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial; Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is moot.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial and Final Status Conference to August 27, 2020.
Each party may file a supplemental declaration within ten days of this order.
Relevant Law
“To ensure the prompt disposition of civil cases, the dates assigned for a trial are firm. All parties and their counsel must regard the date set for trial as certain.” (CRC Rule 3.1332(a).) Trial continuances may be granted only on an affirmative showing of good cause. (CRC Rule 3.1332(c); Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Mgmt., Inc. (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 1112, 1127.)
Good cause may be shown b
Hearing Date
July 01, 2020
Type
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 36
SANDRA BERNAL, Plaintiff, v. ARCONIC VALLEY-TODECO, INC., et al., Defendants.
Case No.: BC721408
Hearing Date: 7/1/2020
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial; Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is moot.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial and Final Status Conference to August 27, 2020.
Each party may file a supplemental declaration within ten days of this order.
Relevant Law
“To ensure the prompt disposition of civil cases, the dates assigned for a trial are firm. All parties and their counsel must regard the date set for trial as certain.” (CRC Rule 3.1332(a).) Trial continuances may be granted only on an affirmative showing of good cause. (CRC Rule 3.1332(c); Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Mgmt., Inc. (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 1112, 1127.)
Good cause may be shown b