HOSSEIN FATEHMANESH; Plaintiff, v. DAVID LALLY; Defendant.
Case No.: BC713469
Hearing Date: July 2, 2019
[TENTATIVE] order RE:
defendanT’s Demurrer to THE complaint
MOVING PARTY: Defendant David Lally
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Hossein Fatehmanesh
The Court has considered the moving and opposition papers.
Background
This action arises out of a legal malpractice claim. On July 11, 2018 Plaintiff Hossein Fatehmanesh (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint, using a PLD-PI-001 form, against Defendant David Lally (“Defendant”) alleging causes of action for (1) negligent breach of contract and (2) professional negligence for legal malpractice. On February 26, 2019, Defendant filed the instant demurrer to the complaint. Plaintiff filed an opposition on February 21, 2019, before the demurrer was filed. The Court is not in receipt of any reply papers from Defendant.
On March 14, 2019, the Court issued an order which continued the hearing to July 2, 2019 and required to Defendant to meet and
Hearing Date
July 02, 2019
Type
Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
HOSSEIN FATEHMANESH; Plaintiff, v. DAVID LALLY; Defendant.
Case No.: BC713469
Hearing Date: July 2, 2019
[TENTATIVE] order RE:
defendanT’s Demurrer to THE complaint
MOVING PARTY: Defendant David Lally
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Hossein Fatehmanesh
The Court has considered the moving and opposition papers.
Background
This action arises out of a legal malpractice claim. On July 11, 2018 Plaintiff Hossein Fatehmanesh (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint, using a PLD-PI-001 form, against Defendant David Lally (“Defendant”) alleging causes of action for (1) negligent breach of contract and (2) professional negligence for legal malpractice. On February 26, 2019, Defendant filed the instant demurrer to the complaint. Plaintiff filed an opposition on February 21, 2019, before the demurrer was filed. The Court is not in receipt of any reply papers from Defendant.
On March 14, 2019, the Court issued an order which continued the hearing to July 2, 2019 and required to Defendant to meet and