SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

MANUEL ORDAZ, etc., Plaintiff, vs. ROMAN PADILLA, etc., et al., Defendants.

CASE NO.: BC713346

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; MOTION TO STRIKE

Date: October 8, 2019

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Dept. 56

MOVING PARTY: Defendant Roman Padilla (“Moving Defendant”)

RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Manuel Ordaz

The Court has considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers in connection with Moving Defendant’s demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Plaintiff failed to file an opposition to Moving Defendant’s motion to strike.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed the First-Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendant alleging causes of action for: (1) financial elder abuse; (2) negligence; (3) controversy real property; (4) unfair business practices under California Business and Professions Code, Section 17200; (5) invasion of privacy; (6) landlord harassment and retaliation;