Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
People of the State of CA, et al., Plaintiffs,
Case No. BC711668 v. [Tentative] Ruling
David Edward Rivera, D.C., et al., Defendants.
Hearing Date: June 29, 2020
Department 49, Judge Stuart M. Rice
(1) Cross-Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Adjudication
Moving Party: Cross-Defendant Chiropractic Health Plan of California (CHPC)
Responding Party: Defendants/Cross-Complainants David Edward Rivera, D.C. and David Rivera Chiropractic, Inc.
Ruling: CHPC’s motion for summary judgment is denied. The motion for summary adjudication is denied as to the first and second causes of action for breach of contract and violation of fair procedure and granted as to the punitive damages claim.
Cross-Complainants’ Evidentiary Objections
Second Amended Cross-Complaint (Exhibit 1)
Objections 1-4 are overruled.
Declaration of John Barton Filed in Opposition to Petition to Compel Arbitration (Exhibit 6)
Objections 5-8 are overruled.
Hearing Date
June 29, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
People of the State of CA, et al., Plaintiffs,
Case No. BC711668 v. [Tentative] Ruling
David Edward Rivera, D.C., et al., Defendants.
Hearing Date: June 29, 2020
Department 49, Judge Stuart M. Rice
(1) Cross-Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Adjudication
Moving Party: Cross-Defendant Chiropractic Health Plan of California (CHPC)
Responding Party: Defendants/Cross-Complainants David Edward Rivera, D.C. and David Rivera Chiropractic, Inc.
Ruling: CHPC’s motion for summary judgment is denied. The motion for summary adjudication is denied as to the first and second causes of action for breach of contract and violation of fair procedure and granted as to the punitive damages claim.
Cross-Complainants’ Evidentiary Objections
Second Amended Cross-Complaint (Exhibit 1)
Objections 1-4 are overruled.
Declaration of John Barton Filed in Opposition to Petition to Compel Arbitration (Exhibit 6)
Objections 5-8 are overruled.