SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
XUE LENG-GARD, Plaintiff, vs. ANGELA WALLACE, et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: BC706320
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRER
8:30 a.m.
November 1, 2018
Dept. 56
This is an action in which Plaintiff alleges that Defendants feigned aiding Plaintiff to collect her deceased husband’s life insurance and stock proceeds only to take such funds for their own use. On May 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed the operative Complaint alleging causes of action for (1) fraud, (2) breach of fiduciary duty, (3) negligence, (4) fraud, (5) breach of fiduciary duty, (6) professional negligence, (7) civil conspiracy to defraud, (8) professional negligence, (9) professional negligence, (10) negligence, and (11) negligence.
Defendants Julias Stewart and Stewart-Reed Law Group, Inc. demur to the ninth cause of action for uncertainty and failure to state sufficient facts. Defendants argue that it is unclear from the Complaint whet
Hearing Date
November 01, 2018
Type
Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
XUE LENG-GARD, Plaintiff, vs. ANGELA WALLACE, et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: BC706320
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRER
8:30 a.m.
November 1, 2018
Dept. 56
This is an action in which Plaintiff alleges that Defendants feigned aiding Plaintiff to collect her deceased husband’s life insurance and stock proceeds only to take such funds for their own use. On May 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed the operative Complaint alleging causes of action for (1) fraud, (2) breach of fiduciary duty, (3) negligence, (4) fraud, (5) breach of fiduciary duty, (6) professional negligence, (7) civil conspiracy to defraud, (8) professional negligence, (9) professional negligence, (10) negligence, and (11) negligence.
Defendants Julias Stewart and Stewart-Reed Law Group, Inc. demur to the ninth cause of action for uncertainty and failure to state sufficient facts. Defendants argue that it is unclear from the Complaint whet