BC705611 ROBERT CHRISTOPHER HENNING VS E S KLUFT & COMPANY INC

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion for summary judgment is denied as there are triable issues of fact including whether plaintiff suffered damages in accepting a job with a salary of $125,000 after the promised job with a salary of $330,000 was revoked, whether Sawan would have terminated plaintiff if plaintiff had not given notice that he was leaving employment with Wesley Allen, what plaintiff said regarding the immigration employee policies, and whether plaintiff’s actions were sufficient to support revocation of the employment before it began. The motion for summary adjudication is denied on procedural grounds.

Timeliness of Opposition

Defendants waived any issue as to the timeliness of the opposition by addressing it on the merits. (Carlton v. Quint (2000) 77 Cal. App. 4th 690, 697.........