# 8. Josefina Robles v. St. Francis Medical Center, et al.
Case No.: BC697012
Matter on calendar for: petition for minor’s compromise (person with a disability)
Tentative ruling:
Background
This is a medical malpractice claim. Plaintiff Josefina Robles appears in this action through her conservator and father, Sergio Robles. Defendants are various healthcare providers. The events took place at the premises of Defendant St. Francis Medical Center and involve the improper administration of epidural anesthesia and airway protection leading to Robles’ severe brain injury.
The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) alleges the following causes of action:
Medical Malpractice;
Negligent Concealment/Negligent Misrepresentation;
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress;
Medical Battery.
Plaintiff, a person with a disability, now petitions for Court approval of her settlement, by and through her guardian ad litem and conservator. The petition is unopposed.
For the reasons set forth below
Type
Med Malpractice (Drs & Surgeons) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
# 8. Josefina Robles v. St. Francis Medical Center, et al.
Case No.: BC697012
Matter on calendar for: petition for minor’s compromise (person with a disability)
Tentative ruling:
Background
This is a medical malpractice claim. Plaintiff Josefina Robles appears in this action through her conservator and father, Sergio Robles. Defendants are various healthcare providers. The events took place at the premises of Defendant St. Francis Medical Center and involve the improper administration of epidural anesthesia and airway protection leading to Robles’ severe brain injury.
The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) alleges the following causes of action:
Medical Malpractice;
Negligent Concealment/Negligent Misrepresentation;
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress;
Medical Battery.
Plaintiff, a person with a disability, now petitions for Court approval of her settlement, by and through her guardian ad litem and conservator. The petition is unopposed.
For the reasons set forth below