BC693815 ANA ROSA RIVERA vs OSTERKAMP TRUCKING INC
Defendant Osterkamp Trucking, Inc. and Luciano Hernandez’ (1) Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena (Rivera Brothers Transport); (2) Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena (Diamond Concrete Supply); and (3) Motion to Quash CAL CARE Deposition Subpoena
TENTATIVE RULINGS:
(1) Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena to Rivera Brothers Transport. The motion is DENIED. Rivera Brothers Transport objections are timely and defendants failed to adequately comply with CCP §2025.220. Both parties’ requests for sanctions are DENIED.
(2) Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena to Diamond Concrete Supply. The motion is DENIED. The court finds defendant’s stated interest in disclosure does not outweigh Rivera’s legally protected privacy interest and objectively reasonable expectation of privacy. Both parties’ requests for sanctions are DENIED.
(3) Motion to Quash CAL CARE Deposition Subpoena
Hearing Date
July 06, 2020
Type
Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
BC693815 ANA ROSA RIVERA vs OSTERKAMP TRUCKING INC
Defendant Osterkamp Trucking, Inc. and Luciano Hernandez’ (1) Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena (Rivera Brothers Transport); (2) Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena (Diamond Concrete Supply); and (3) Motion to Quash CAL CARE Deposition Subpoena
TENTATIVE RULINGS:
(1) Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena to Rivera Brothers Transport. The motion is DENIED. Rivera Brothers Transport objections are timely and defendants failed to adequately comply with CCP §2025.220. Both parties’ requests for sanctions are DENIED.
(2) Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena to Diamond Concrete Supply. The motion is DENIED. The court finds defendant’s stated interest in disclosure does not outweigh Rivera’s legally protected privacy interest and objectively reasonable expectation of privacy. Both parties’ requests for sanctions are DENIED.
(3) Motion to Quash CAL CARE Deposition Subpoena