Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 36
MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendant.
Case No.: BC692872
Hearing Date: 9/9/2021
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Motion for Summary Judgment
The motion is continued to _____________ .
Notice of Motion
The motion, opposition, and reply were each timely filed. (CCP § 437c(a)(2), (b)(2), (4).
Objections to Form
Plaintiff’s procedural objections to the form of Defendant’s moving evidence under California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1350(d) are OVERRULED. (See Opp. at pp. 3-4.) The court’s power to deny summary judgment on basis of failure to comply with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1350 is discretionary, and the format is not so defective that the facts critical to analysis of the motion are not adequately identified or the Plaintiff is unable to reasonably respond. (See Truong v. Glasser (2009) 181 Cal.App.4th 102, 118.)
Additional Discovery
Code of Civil Pro
Hearing Date
September 09, 2021
Type
Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 36
MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendant.
Case No.: BC692872
Hearing Date: 9/9/2021
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Motion for Summary Judgment
The motion is continued to _____________ .
Notice of Motion
The motion, opposition, and reply were each timely filed. (CCP § 437c(a)(2), (b)(2), (4).
Objections to Form
Plaintiff’s procedural objections to the form of Defendant’s moving evidence under California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1350(d) are OVERRULED. (See Opp. at pp. 3-4.) The court’s power to deny summary judgment on basis of failure to comply with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1350 is discretionary, and the format is not so defective that the facts critical to analysis of the motion are not adequately identified or the Plaintiff is unable to reasonably respond. (See Truong v. Glasser (2009) 181 Cal.App.4th 102, 118.)
Additional Discovery
Code of Civil Pro