SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
GREGG “ROCKY” BROOKS, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN C. DEPP, etc., et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: BC713123
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO BE ADMITTED AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE
Date: July 8, 2020
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
MOVING PARTIES: Defendants John C. Depp, II and Infinitum Nihil
Defendants filed a verified application for Benjamin G. Chew (“Chew”) to specially appear as counsel pro hac vice on behalf of Defendants. The pro hac vice application of Chew is not completely compliant with California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40(c)(1) as it was not filed with a proof of service indicating that a copy of such application and notice of the hearing in connection with the application was served on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office.
The Court, however, would like to give Defendants the opportunity to comply with the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40 given that th
Hearing Date
July 08, 2020
Type
Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
GREGG “ROCKY” BROOKS, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN C. DEPP, etc., et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: BC713123
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO BE ADMITTED AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE
Date: July 8, 2020
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
MOVING PARTIES: Defendants John C. Depp, II and Infinitum Nihil
Defendants filed a verified application for Benjamin G. Chew (“Chew”) to specially appear as counsel pro hac vice on behalf of Defendants. The pro hac vice application of Chew is not completely compliant with California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40(c)(1) as it was not filed with a proof of service indicating that a copy of such application and notice of the hearing in connection with the application was served on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office.
The Court, however, would like to give Defendants the opportunity to comply with the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40 given that th