[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT’S FURTHER RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY; MOTION GRANTED, IN PART

On January 3, 2015, Plaintiff Lauri Trapp (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Vruyr Ginosyan (“Defendant”) for negligence relating to a May 19, 2017 automobile versus bicycle accident. On January 11, 2018, Plaintiff served a Demand for Production of Documents, Set One and Requests for Admissions, Set One on Defendant. (Declaration of Barry A. Drucker, ¶ 6; Exh. 4.) Defendant served responses on March 15, 2018. (Drucker Decl., ¶ 7; Exh. 5.) Plaintiff believed the responses were insufficient and sent meet and confer letters to defense counsel to resolve the issues, but no response was received. (Drucker Decl., ¶¶ 7-9.) Plaintiff moves to compel further responses and monetary sanctions.

Upon receipt of discovery requests, the propounding party may move for an order compelling a further response if the propounding party deems........