MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY LITIGATION
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Rose Diplomat, LLC
RESPONDING PARTY(S): Defendants Christine E. Nelsen Stratton, individually and as Trustee for the Stratton Family Revocable Trust; Mary Nelsen; Julie Paine Frits; Emily Paine; Franklin Paine; Joan Weamer; Margaret Parker; Norah Gail Forgues; Gary W. Parker; Terry R. Parker; Pamela M. Hanover; Thomas Banning, Jr.; Patricia Hanover; William L. Banning; and Donald Stratton, Individually and as Trustee for the Stratton Family Revocable Trust.
PROOF OF SERVICE:
ANALYSIS
Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation
Pursuant to agreement of the parties, the pending arbitration is currently stayed. See March 9, 2018 Letter from the American Arbitration Association. The Court entered its order on summary adjudication on April 29, 2019, granting the motion for summary adjudication as to Issue No. 1 re: the first cause of action and denying the motion for summary adjudication as to the third, fou
Hearing Date
June 05, 2019
Type
Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY LITIGATION
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Rose Diplomat, LLC
RESPONDING PARTY(S): Defendants Christine E. Nelsen Stratton, individually and as Trustee for the Stratton Family Revocable Trust; Mary Nelsen; Julie Paine Frits; Emily Paine; Franklin Paine; Joan Weamer; Margaret Parker; Norah Gail Forgues; Gary W. Parker; Terry R. Parker; Pamela M. Hanover; Thomas Banning, Jr.; Patricia Hanover; William L. Banning; and Donald Stratton, Individually and as Trustee for the Stratton Family Revocable Trust.
PROOF OF SERVICE:
ANALYSIS
Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation
Pursuant to agreement of the parties, the pending arbitration is currently stayed. See March 9, 2018 Letter from the American Arbitration Association. The Court entered its order on summary adjudication on April 29, 2019, granting the motion for summary adjudication as to Issue No. 1 re: the first cause of action and denying the motion for summary adjudication as to the third, fou