HEARING DATE: Continued to July 10, 2019
CASE NUMBER: BC677372
CASE NAME: Gloria Hernandez v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
MOVING PARTIES: Defendant Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiff Gloria Hernandez
TRIAL DATE: September 17, 2019
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
MOTION: Filed April 26, 2019
OPPOSITION: Filed June 26, 2019
REPLY: Filed of July 5, 2019
TENTATIVE: Defendants motion for summary adjudication is GRANTED. Counsel for Defendant to give notice. Counsel for Defendant to prepare a proposed judgment within ten days and circulate it to Plaintiff’s counsel. Submit it for review and entry within fifteen days thereafter.
Background
This employment action arises from allegations that Defendant Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (“Defendant”) discriminated against Plaintiff Gloria Hernandez (“Plaintiff”) because of her disabilities and retaliation against her because of complaints Plaintif
Hearing Date
July 10, 2019
Type
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
HEARING DATE: Continued to July 10, 2019
CASE NUMBER: BC677372
CASE NAME: Gloria Hernandez v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
MOVING PARTIES: Defendant Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiff Gloria Hernandez
TRIAL DATE: September 17, 2019
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
MOTION: Filed April 26, 2019
OPPOSITION: Filed June 26, 2019
REPLY: Filed of July 5, 2019
TENTATIVE: Defendants motion for summary adjudication is GRANTED. Counsel for Defendant to give notice. Counsel for Defendant to prepare a proposed judgment within ten days and circulate it to Plaintiff’s counsel. Submit it for review and entry within fifteen days thereafter.
Background
This employment action arises from allegations that Defendant Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (“Defendant”) discriminated against Plaintiff Gloria Hernandez (“Plaintiff”) because of her disabilities and retaliation against her because of complaints Plaintif