CASE NAME: Acfalle, et al. v. Sares Regis Management Co., et al.
CASE NO.: BC676523
HEARING DATE: 11/28/18
DEPARTMENT: 37
CALENDAR NO.: 9
FILING DATE: 9/20/17
FSC/TRIAL DATE: 8/12/19 (FSC), 8/20/19 (Trial)
NOTICE: OK
SUBJECT: Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings[1]
MOVING PARTY: Defendant Sares Regis Management Co.[2]
OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiffs Michael Acfalle & Vijay
The Court GRANTS the motion with 20 days leave to amend. Counsel for Defendant to give notice.
This case arises from allegations that Defendant Sares Regis Management Company (“Sares”) engaged in discriminatory housing practices in violation of the Disabled Persons Act (“DPA”) and Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). Plaintiffs Michael Acfalle (“Acfalle”) and Vijay (no additional name listed) allege that they leased an apartment in the Boulevard apartment complex from March 6, 2015 to November 28, 2016. According to Plaintiffs, Acfalle was subjected to discrimination, harassment and retaliation on account
Hearing Date
November 28, 2018
Type
Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
CASE NAME: Acfalle, et al. v. Sares Regis Management Co., et al.
CASE NO.: BC676523
HEARING DATE: 11/28/18
DEPARTMENT: 37
CALENDAR NO.: 9
FILING DATE: 9/20/17
FSC/TRIAL DATE: 8/12/19 (FSC), 8/20/19 (Trial)
NOTICE: OK
SUBJECT: Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings[1]
MOVING PARTY: Defendant Sares Regis Management Co.[2]
OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiffs Michael Acfalle & Vijay
The Court GRANTS the motion with 20 days leave to amend. Counsel for Defendant to give notice.
This case arises from allegations that Defendant Sares Regis Management Company (“Sares”) engaged in discriminatory housing practices in violation of the Disabled Persons Act (“DPA”) and Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). Plaintiffs Michael Acfalle (“Acfalle”) and Vijay (no additional name listed) allege that they leased an apartment in the Boulevard apartment complex from March 6, 2015 to November 28, 2016. According to Plaintiffs, Acfalle was subjected to discrimination, harassment and retaliation on account