BC671153 MARIA GUADALUPE MARTINEZ vs PHARMAVITE
Defendant Pharmavite’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication
TENTATIVE RULING:
Judicial Notice
The court takes judicial notice of January 9, 2020, order. Evid. Code §§ 452, 453
Evidentiary Objections
Defendant’s objections to the Declaration of Maria Martinez are OVERRULED.
Defendants unspecified objections to plaintiff’s additional facts are OVERRULED.
Issues as Framed by the Pleadings
The FAC alleges causes of action for: disability discrimination, failure to provide reasonable accommodation, failure to engage in good faith interactive process, retaliation, and wrongful termination in violation of public policy.
Has the Moving Party Met Its Burden of Production Showing No Triable Issue of Material Fact?
Failure to Accommodate. The court finds there is a genuine dispute as to whether Defendant offered Plaintiff an available position in which she was qualified for and whether Defendant did every
Hearing Date
July 23, 2020
Type
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
BC671153 MARIA GUADALUPE MARTINEZ vs PHARMAVITE
Defendant Pharmavite’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication
TENTATIVE RULING:
Judicial Notice
The court takes judicial notice of January 9, 2020, order. Evid. Code §§ 452, 453
Evidentiary Objections
Defendant’s objections to the Declaration of Maria Martinez are OVERRULED.
Defendants unspecified objections to plaintiff’s additional facts are OVERRULED.
Issues as Framed by the Pleadings
The FAC alleges causes of action for: disability discrimination, failure to provide reasonable accommodation, failure to engage in good faith interactive process, retaliation, and wrongful termination in violation of public policy.
Has the Moving Party Met Its Burden of Production Showing No Triable Issue of Material Fact?
Failure to Accommodate. The court finds there is a genuine dispute as to whether Defendant offered Plaintiff an available position in which she was qualified for and whether Defendant did every