JUANA DELINA JONES, Plaintiff, vs. LIFEHOUSE BAKERSFIELD OPERATIONS, LLC, Defendant
Case No.: BC660388
[TENTATIVE] ORDER SUSTAINING DEMURRER WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
On May 5, 2017, Plaintiff Juana Delina Jones (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Lifehouse Bakersfield Operations, LLC dba Bakersfield Healthcare Center (“Defendant”) and Does 1 through 200 for (1) elder abuse (Welfare and Institutions Code sections 15600 et seq.); (2) negligence; and (3) violation of Residents’ Rights (Health and Safety Code section 1430(b)).
On June 26, 2017, Defendant filed the instant demurrer to complaint and motion to strike. No oppositions have been filed.
Defendant demurs to the first cause of action for elder abuse and third cause of action for violation of resident’s rights.
Defendant contends the first cause of action for elder abuse fails as Plaintiff fails to allege sufficient facts. Defendant argues that Plaintiff fails to allege any facts as to the mindset of the alleged abus
Hearing Date
August 25, 2017
Type
Elder/Dependent Adult Abuse Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
JUANA DELINA JONES, Plaintiff, vs. LIFEHOUSE BAKERSFIELD OPERATIONS, LLC, Defendant
Case No.: BC660388
[TENTATIVE] ORDER SUSTAINING DEMURRER WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
On May 5, 2017, Plaintiff Juana Delina Jones (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Lifehouse Bakersfield Operations, LLC dba Bakersfield Healthcare Center (“Defendant”) and Does 1 through 200 for (1) elder abuse (Welfare and Institutions Code sections 15600 et seq.); (2) negligence; and (3) violation of Residents’ Rights (Health and Safety Code section 1430(b)).
On June 26, 2017, Defendant filed the instant demurrer to complaint and motion to strike. No oppositions have been filed.
Defendant demurs to the first cause of action for elder abuse and third cause of action for violation of resident’s rights.
Defendant contends the first cause of action for elder abuse fails as Plaintiff fails to allege sufficient facts. Defendant argues that Plaintiff fails to allege any facts as to the mindset of the alleged abus