Nigel hudson; Plaintiff, vs. john bachsian, et al.; Defendants.
Case No.: BC659102
Hearing Date: January 22, 2021
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE:
dEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR rECONSIDERATION OF RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
dEFENDANT jOHN bACHSIAN’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TAX COSTS
Plaintiff Nigel Hudson’s MOTION TO TAX COSTS
Moving Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Defendant John Bachsian’s Motion to Tax Costs is DENIED.
Moving Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees is CONTINUED until March3,2021. Plaintiff Hudson’s Motion to Tax Costs is similarly CONTINUED. Moving Defendants to file supplemental documentation exclusively as to attorneys’ fees specific to Bachsian in connection with the November 8, 2018 hearing by February 3, 2021. Plaintiff to file Opposition by February 17, 2021.
Factual Background
The factual background relating to this motion is fully set forth in the Final Statement of Decision re Phase II of Trial issued
Hearing Date
January 22, 2021
Type
Breach Contract/Warnty-Negligence (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Nigel hudson; Plaintiff, vs. john bachsian, et al.; Defendants.
Case No.: BC659102
Hearing Date: January 22, 2021
[TENTATIVE] RULING RE:
dEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR rECONSIDERATION OF RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
dEFENDANT jOHN bACHSIAN’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TAX COSTS
Plaintiff Nigel Hudson’s MOTION TO TAX COSTS
Moving Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Defendant John Bachsian’s Motion to Tax Costs is DENIED.
Moving Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees is CONTINUED until March3,2021. Plaintiff Hudson’s Motion to Tax Costs is similarly CONTINUED. Moving Defendants to file supplemental documentation exclusively as to attorneys’ fees specific to Bachsian in connection with the November 8, 2018 hearing by February 3, 2021. Plaintiff to file Opposition by February 17, 2021.
Factual Background
The factual background relating to this motion is fully set forth in the Final Statement of Decision re Phase II of Trial issued