Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party
Patricia D. Nieto
(Subscribe to View)
February 5, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Med Malpractice (Drs & Surgeons) (General Jurisdiction)
ANDAL LAW GROUP - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
DAHIYA S. M.D. - Defendant/Respondent
DAHIYA SHYAM L. M.D. - Defendant/Respondent
DAVID B. LU M.D. INC - Defendant/Respondent
DOES 1 -200 - Defendant/Respondent
GARDENS REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL - Defendant/Respondent
KELLY JOHN C. ESQ. - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
LU DAVID BORJING. M.D. - Defendant/Respondent
MILLAN AGNES - Plaintiff/Petitioner
PRINDLE GOETZ BARNES & REINHOLTZ LLP - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
SHYAM DAHIYA M.D INC - Defendant/Respondent
May 11, 2018
Feb 27, 2018
Aug 24, 2017
Celia Ruiz Vs Recana Solutions Llc Et Al
Tiffany Austin Vs Byd Coach & Bus, Llc
J.H. (John) Niedercorn Vs Green Country Filter Mfg., Llc
Steve S. Kim Vs In Sook Park, As Trustee Of The Park Family Trust, Et Al.
Beatrice Hamlin, Et Al. Vs Emericare, Inc., Et Al.
Lawrence Turner Vs Center Street Lending Services Et Al
(No Case Name Available)
Rafael Ruano Vs Mayekawa U.S.A.., Inc., An Illinois Corporation
Inhance Digital Corporation., A Delaware Corporation Vs Maziar Farzam
Soleimani & Associates, Aplc Vs Fariba Djahanbani
Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Execute Authorizations for Income and Disability Records by Defendant Shyam Dahiya, M.D., filed on December 28, 2017, is GRANTED. Background Plaintiff Agnes Millan filed the instant suit on February 16, 2017, against various doctors and medical facilities, including moving Defendant Shyam Dahiya, alleging medical malpractice and negligence. Defendant believes at least some of Plaintiff’s injuries pre-exist the medical treatment at issue in this suit. To investigate this issue, Defendant sought discovery of various employment records and disability claims made by Plaintiff from her employer, the U.S. Post Office, as well as from the U.S. Department of Labor and Social Security Administration, which handled the claims in question. Defendant received a response, indicating that state courts lacked authority to subpoena personnel records from federal agencies. Instead, Defendant could either seek a ........
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.