SUBJECT: Petition to Approve Minor’s Compromise
Moving Party: Plaintiff Shanice Estis
Resp. Party: None
The petition to confirm minor’s compromise is DENIED.
BACKGROUND:
On February 15, 2017, Plaintiffs Mel Lewis, Cornelia Rozier, Shanice Estis, Zion Lewis, and Jacqulyne Cummings commenced this action against Jennie D. Schueneman for (1) negligent maintenance of premises; (2) nuisance; (3) breach of warranty of habitability, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment; (5) negligent violations of statutory and legal duties; and (6) intentional violations of statutory and legal duties.
“This lawsuit involves Plaintiffs’ claims arising out of their tenancy at an apartment building located at 1842 1/2 S. Gramercy Place, Los Angeles, California 90019 (‘the Property’), which was owned/managed by Defendant. During Plaintiffs’ tenancy, the Property was unsafe, uninhabitable, in a state of disrepair, and in violation of building, health and safety laws. Defendant further demolished the garages
Hearing Date
October 29, 2019
Type
Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 06/21/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUBJECT: Petition to Approve Minor’s Compromise
Moving Party: Plaintiff Shanice Estis
Resp. Party: None
The petition to confirm minor’s compromise is DENIED.
BACKGROUND:
On February 15, 2017, Plaintiffs Mel Lewis, Cornelia Rozier, Shanice Estis, Zion Lewis, and Jacqulyne Cummings commenced this action against Jennie D. Schueneman for (1) negligent maintenance of premises; (2) nuisance; (3) breach of warranty of habitability, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment; (5) negligent violations of statutory and legal duties; and (6) intentional violations of statutory and legal duties.
“This lawsuit involves Plaintiffs’ claims arising out of their tenancy at an apartment building located at 1842 1/2 S. Gramercy Place, Los Angeles, California 90019 (‘the Property’), which was owned/managed by Defendant. During Plaintiffs’ tenancy, the Property was unsafe, uninhabitable, in a state of disrepair, and in violation of building, health and safety laws. Defendant further demolished the garages