Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE RULING
SUSAN CHAN CHOW, et al., vs. MA LEYBA, et al.
Case No.: BC648838
Hearing Date: July 9, 2020
Defendant St. Vincent Medical Center’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
Defendant St. Vincent Medical Center (“Defendant”) moves for summary judgment on the operative fourth amended complaint of Plaintiff Lindsey Chow (“Plaintiff”). (Notice of Motion, pgs. 1-2; C.C.P. §437c(a).)
Evidentiary Objections & Request for Judicial Notice
Plaintiff’s 4/6/20 request for judicial notice is granted as to the statutes or caselaw referred to in Exhibits 1-4, 6 – 11, 13-15) (but not Plaintiff’s comments or analysis of those exhibits), and denied as to Exhibits 5, 12 (P-RJN, Exhs. 1-15; Opposition pgs. 41-52.)
Plaintiff’s 4/6/20 evidentiary objection titled “Objection Part One” is overruled. (Opposition, pgs. 20-21.) Plaintiff’s 4/6/20 evidentiary objection to the declaration of Defendant’s expert witness Dr. An
Hearing Date
July 09, 2020
Type
Med Malpractice (Drs & Surgeons) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE RULING
SUSAN CHAN CHOW, et al., vs. MA LEYBA, et al.
Case No.: BC648838
Hearing Date: July 9, 2020
Defendant St. Vincent Medical Center’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
Defendant St. Vincent Medical Center (“Defendant”) moves for summary judgment on the operative fourth amended complaint of Plaintiff Lindsey Chow (“Plaintiff”). (Notice of Motion, pgs. 1-2; C.C.P. §437c(a).)
Evidentiary Objections & Request for Judicial Notice
Plaintiff’s 4/6/20 request for judicial notice is granted as to the statutes or caselaw referred to in Exhibits 1-4, 6 – 11, 13-15) (but not Plaintiff’s comments or analysis of those exhibits), and denied as to Exhibits 5, 12 (P-RJN, Exhs. 1-15; Opposition pgs. 41-52.)
Plaintiff’s 4/6/20 evidentiary objection titled “Objection Part One” is overruled. (Opposition, pgs. 20-21.) Plaintiff’s 4/6/20 evidentiary objection to the declaration of Defendant’s expert witness Dr. An