richard breakspear, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. laurence grante, et al., Defendants.
Case No.: BC 648462
Hearing Date: May 14, 2018
Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m.
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE:
PLAINTIFFS AND CROSS-DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT
AND RELATED CROSS ACTION
Factual Background
Plaintiffs Richard Breakspear (“Breakspear”) and BreakNite, Inc. (“BreakNite”) (jointly, “Plaintiffs”) filed the instant action against Defendant Laurence Grante (“Grante”) and Granite Productions, Inc. dba Think Up Anger (“TUA”) (jointly, “Defendants”) on January 26, 2017. Thereafter, TUA filed a cross-complaint against Plaintiffs. The operative First Amended Cross-Complaint asserts causes of action for intentional misrepresentation, breach of oral contract, conversion, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, fraudulent registration of trademark, and unfair business practices (the “FACC”).
Plaintiffs now demur to each cause of action in the FACC. TUA opposes.
Evidence
Hearing Date
May 14, 2018
Type
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
richard breakspear, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. laurence grante, et al., Defendants.
Case No.: BC 648462
Hearing Date: May 14, 2018
Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m.
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE:
PLAINTIFFS AND CROSS-DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT
AND RELATED CROSS ACTION
Factual Background
Plaintiffs Richard Breakspear (“Breakspear”) and BreakNite, Inc. (“BreakNite”) (jointly, “Plaintiffs”) filed the instant action against Defendant Laurence Grante (“Grante”) and Granite Productions, Inc. dba Think Up Anger (“TUA”) (jointly, “Defendants”) on January 26, 2017. Thereafter, TUA filed a cross-complaint against Plaintiffs. The operative First Amended Cross-Complaint asserts causes of action for intentional misrepresentation, breach of oral contract, conversion, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, fraudulent registration of trademark, and unfair business practices (the “FACC”).
Plaintiffs now demur to each cause of action in the FACC. TUA opposes.
Evidence