Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Southwest District
Torrance Dept. B
ROBERT PIONTKOWSKI, Plaintiff,
Case No.: BC636816 vs. [Tentative] RULING
VEOLIA ES INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendants.
Hearing Date: October 15, 2019
Moving Parties: Defendants Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor Corporation
Responding Party: Plaintiff Robert Piontkowski
Motion to Continue Trial
The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.
RULING
Trial is continued from February 4, 2020 to July 14, 2020, at 8:30 a.m., in Department B. The Final Status Conference is continued to July 7, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. in Department B. Discovery cut-off (including expert witness exchange) and motion cut-off dates shall be based on the new trial date. Defendants are to reserve a hearing date for their motion for summary judgment forthwith.
BACKGROUND
On October 11, 2016, Robert Piontkowski filed a complaint against Veolia Industrial Services, Inc., Veolia North America, LLC, and Veo
Hearing Date
October 15, 2019
Type
Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Southwest District
Torrance Dept. B
ROBERT PIONTKOWSKI, Plaintiff,
Case No.: BC636816 vs. [Tentative] RULING
VEOLIA ES INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendants.
Hearing Date: October 15, 2019
Moving Parties: Defendants Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor Corporation
Responding Party: Plaintiff Robert Piontkowski
Motion to Continue Trial
The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.
RULING
Trial is continued from February 4, 2020 to July 14, 2020, at 8:30 a.m., in Department B. The Final Status Conference is continued to July 7, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. in Department B. Discovery cut-off (including expert witness exchange) and motion cut-off dates shall be based on the new trial date. Defendants are to reserve a hearing date for their motion for summary judgment forthwith.
BACKGROUND
On October 11, 2016, Robert Piontkowski filed a complaint against Veolia Industrial Services, Inc., Veolia North America, LLC, and Veo