Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Michelle King, Sergio Franco, and Karla Gould’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Adjudication is GRANTED only as to the Third Cause of Action, but otherwise DENIED.
Defendants to give notice.
MOTION TO SEAL
The court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it expressly finds facts that establish:
(1) There exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the record;
(2) The overriding interest supports sealing the record;
(3) A substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed;
(4) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
(5) No less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest.
(California Rules of Court (“CRC”) Rule 2.550, subd. (d).)
A party moving to seal records must make a sufficient evidentiary showing to overcome the presumed right of public access to the documents. (see Huffy Corp. v. Superior Court (“Huffy”)
Hearing Date
October 15, 2020
Type
Other Employment Complaint (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Michelle King, Sergio Franco, and Karla Gould’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Adjudication is GRANTED only as to the Third Cause of Action, but otherwise DENIED.
Defendants to give notice.
MOTION TO SEAL
The court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it expressly finds facts that establish:
(1) There exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the record;
(2) The overriding interest supports sealing the record;
(3) A substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed;
(4) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
(5) No less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest.
(California Rules of Court (“CRC”) Rule 2.550, subd. (d).)
A party moving to seal records must make a sufficient evidentiary showing to overcome the presumed right of public access to the documents. (see Huffy Corp. v. Superior Court (“Huffy”)