On July 1, 2016, Paintiff Moon filed a complaint against Defendants Mi Hong Park, Hae Won Park, Royce Sejoon Park, Royce City, Inc., and Does 1 through 10 for (1) breach of contract, (2) fraud and deceit, and (3) intentional misrepresentation, praying for $55,000 in principal damages. Plaintiff requests a court judgment against all four defendants in the principal amount of $55,000 plus interest and costs for a total of $57,093.72.
Procedural Requirements
On August 25 2016, default was entered against all four Defendants. No pending motion to vacate default appears in the record. The default judgment packet includes a request for dismissal of Does 1 through 10 and a proposed form of judgment on the appropriate Judicial Council form. Plaintiff’s counsel signed a declaration of nonmilitary status. Plaintiff requests the same amount of principal damages as prayed for in the complaint. The Court has reviewed the proofs of service of summons filed (duplicatively) on August 8, 2016 and Au
Hearing Date
December 09, 2016
Type
Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
On July 1, 2016, Paintiff Moon filed a complaint against Defendants Mi Hong Park, Hae Won Park, Royce Sejoon Park, Royce City, Inc., and Does 1 through 10 for (1) breach of contract, (2) fraud and deceit, and (3) intentional misrepresentation, praying for $55,000 in principal damages. Plaintiff requests a court judgment against all four defendants in the principal amount of $55,000 plus interest and costs for a total of $57,093.72.
Procedural Requirements
On August 25 2016, default was entered against all four Defendants. No pending motion to vacate default appears in the record. The default judgment packet includes a request for dismissal of Does 1 through 10 and a proposed form of judgment on the appropriate Judicial Council form. Plaintiff’s counsel signed a declaration of nonmilitary status. Plaintiff requests the same amount of principal damages as prayed for in the complaint. The Court has reviewed the proofs of service of summons filed (duplicatively) on August 8, 2016 and Au