STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO., Plaintiff, vs. RUFINO PECH, et al., Defendants.

CASE NO.: BC622451

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES

Dept. 98
1:30 p.m.
March 28, 2017

On June 3, 2016, Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Rufino Pech and Patricia Leyva (“Leyva”). On October 18, 2016, Plaintiff served Leyva with Form Interrogatories, Set One and Special Interrogatories, Set One. Leyva has failed to respond. Plaintiff therefore now moves to compel Leyva’s responses to these outstanding discovery requests and for monetary sanctions.

If a party fails to serve a timely response to a demand for production or interrogatories, the party making the demand may move for an order compelling a response. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(b), 2031.300(b). The party to whom the demand or interrogatories are directed waives any objection, including those based on privile