Teresa A. Beaudet
(Subscribe to View)
September 20, 2016
Los Angeles County, CA
Other Commercial/Business Tort (General Jurisdiction)
CONSTELLATIONS BRANDS INC. - Defendant/Respondent
DOES 1 -100 - Defendant/Respondent
GERARD II ROBERT J. - Defendant/Respondent
GREIWE CRAIG - Defendant/Respondent
JACOBSON BRETT - Plaintiff/Petitioner
KVETON KYLE - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
LAW OFFICE OF BRENT KRAMER - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
LOTTO LOTTO GAMZ ETC INC. - Plaintiff/Petitioner
MATLICK JON - Defendant/Respondent
SOLOMON CORINNE - Defendant/Respondent
YOUNG STEVEN E. ESQ. - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
Jun 23, 2017
Apr 27, 2017
Mar 17, 2017
Jan 06, 2017
Juan Leon Vs Nissan North America, Inc.
Ahoura Vahedi Vs State Of California Et Al
Cristian Flores Vs Comex Kc, Llc, A California Limited Liability Company
Melinda Leblanc Vs Kia Motors America, Inc, Et Al.
Emily, An Individual Beland Vs Brian J. Anderson, As Trustee Or To Any Successor Trustee, As Trustee Of The Brian J. Anderson Living Trust, Dated June 7, 2018, Et Al.
Rayond Shofler Et Al Vs Alan C Fox Et Al
Mdr Boat Central Lp Et Al Vs County Of Los Angeles Et Al
(No Case Name Available)
Randy Rhoads Vs Western Refrigerated Freight Systems, Inc.
Alexander Weinberger Vs Mclaren Automotive, Inc., A Delaware Corporation, Et Al.
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 50 BRETT JACOBSON, et al. Plaintiff, vs. CORINNE SOLOMON, et al. Defendants. Case No.: BC 621707 Hearing Date: September 20, 2016 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: BRENT A. KRAMER’S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS Brent A. Kramer moves to be relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiffs Brett Jacobson and Lotto Lotto Gamz Etc, Inc. The Court finds that counsel has complied with the procedural requirements (CRC 3.1362) and has provided a sufficient reason for his withdrawal. Although counsel requests an in camera hearing, the Court finds that such a hearing is unnecessary. Counsel has sufficiently stated his reasons for bringing this motion in general terms. (See CRC 3.1362(c).) Accordingly, it is the intent of the Court to grant the unopposed motion to be relieved as counsel. ........
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.