mitchell walter woolley vs. american curvet investment, llc ; AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINT; BC621497, june 5. 2018
[TENTATIVE] Order RE: PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-DEFENDANT MITCHELL WALTER WOOLLEY DBA E-MARKETING ASSOCIATES’ MOTION TO DETERMINE ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant MITCHELL WALTER WOOLLEY DBA E-MARKETING ASSOCIATES’ Motion to Determine Attorney’s Fees and Costs is GRANTED.
Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant MITCHELL WALTER WOOLLEY DBA E-MARKETING ASSOCIATES is entitled to attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $40,000.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Mitchell Walter Woolley dba E-Marketing Associates (“EMA”) filed this action on May 24, 2016 against Defendant and Cross-Complainant American Curvet Investment, LLC dba LA Crystal Hotel (“LAC”). LAC filed a Cross-Complaint against EMA and Cross-Defendant Ping Dai (“Dai”) on June 30, 2016. The parties dispute stems from a contract between EMA and LAC for certain marketing services to be provided by E
Hearing Date
June 05, 2018
Type
Breach Contrct/Warnty (Sellr Pltf) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
mitchell walter woolley vs. american curvet investment, llc ; AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINT; BC621497, june 5. 2018
[TENTATIVE] Order RE: PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-DEFENDANT MITCHELL WALTER WOOLLEY DBA E-MARKETING ASSOCIATES’ MOTION TO DETERMINE ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant MITCHELL WALTER WOOLLEY DBA E-MARKETING ASSOCIATES’ Motion to Determine Attorney’s Fees and Costs is GRANTED.
Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant MITCHELL WALTER WOOLLEY DBA E-MARKETING ASSOCIATES is entitled to attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $40,000.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Mitchell Walter Woolley dba E-Marketing Associates (“EMA”) filed this action on May 24, 2016 against Defendant and Cross-Complainant American Curvet Investment, LLC dba LA Crystal Hotel (“LAC”). LAC filed a Cross-Complaint against EMA and Cross-Defendant Ping Dai (“Dai”) on June 30, 2016. The parties dispute stems from a contract between EMA and LAC for certain marketing services to be provided by E