Zagajeski v. Alliance Nursing Centers, Inc. (BC618049)
Defense counsels, Melanie A. Ayerh and Noelle M. Natoli-Duffy’s MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
Respondent: NO OPPOSITION
TENTATIVE RULING
Defense counsels, Melanie A. Ayerh and Noelle M. Natoli-Duffy’s motion to be relieved as counsel is GRANTED. The order shall take effect when the proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the client is filed with the court. Mater will set at the hearing for an OSC re: if no new counsel, should the Answer of the corporate defendant be stricken ans the matter proceed by default judgment?
Good cause exists to grant the motion based on any of the grounds under Rule 3-700(C). Rule 3-700(c) provides that an attorney may withdraw based on any of the following: (1) The client (a) insists upon presenting a claim or defense that is not warranted under existing law and cannot be supported by good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or (b) seeks to pursu
Hearing Date
July 06, 2017
Type
Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Zagajeski v. Alliance Nursing Centers, Inc. (BC618049)
Defense counsels, Melanie A. Ayerh and Noelle M. Natoli-Duffy’s MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
Respondent: NO OPPOSITION
TENTATIVE RULING
Defense counsels, Melanie A. Ayerh and Noelle M. Natoli-Duffy’s motion to be relieved as counsel is GRANTED. The order shall take effect when the proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the client is filed with the court. Mater will set at the hearing for an OSC re: if no new counsel, should the Answer of the corporate defendant be stricken ans the matter proceed by default judgment?
Good cause exists to grant the motion based on any of the grounds under Rule 3-700(C). Rule 3-700(c) provides that an attorney may withdraw based on any of the following: (1) The client (a) insists upon presenting a claim or defense that is not warranted under existing law and cannot be supported by good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or (b) seeks to pursu