April 26, 2019
NCD
civil
Intentional PI/PD/WD (eg. assault) (General Jurisdiction)
Pending
Click on any of the below link(s) to see Register of Action Items on or before the date indicated:
COLE JONATHAN B. ESQ. Attorney for DefendantResp…
Track This PartyDANEIL V. BEHISNILIAN LAW … Former Attorney for Plaint…
Track This PartyDOES 1 THROUGH 100 DefendantRespondent
Track This PartyFERMANYAN MARINA Plaintiff
Track This PartyFERMANYAN MARINA PlaintiffPetitioner
Track This PartyFERMANYAN MARINA Plaintiff, & Plaintiff…
Track This PartyFITILCHYAN ARUTYUN Defendant
Track This PartyFITILCHYAN ARUTYUN Defendant
Track This PartyFITILCHYAN ARUTYUN DefendantRespondent
Track This PartyGASPARYAN HRACHYA Defendant
Track This PartyGASPARYAN HRACHYA DefendantRespondent
Track This PartyGASPARYAN HRACHYA Defendant
Track This PartyGREENBLATT FREDRIC JAY Attorney for Defendant
Track This PartyGREENBLATT FREDRIC JAY Attorney for Plaintiff
Track This PartyGREENBLATTLOVERIDGE ATTORN… Attorney for Defendant
Track This PartyJERMAKYAN ARMEN (ARMENAK) DefendantRespondent
Track This PartyJERMAKYAN ARMEN AK Defendant
Track This PartyJERMAKYAN ARMEN AK Defendant
Track This PartyJERMAKYAN ARMEN ARMENAK Defendant
Track This PartyLAW OFFICES OF DANIEL V. B… Attorney for PlaintiffPeti…
Track This PartyClick on any of the below link(s) to see Register of Action Items on or before the date indicated:
MADATYAN ELDA Plaintiff, & Plaintiff…
Track This PartyMADATYAN ELDA Plaintiff
Track This PartyMADATYAN ELDA PlaintiffPetitioner
Track This PartyMIYAMOTO RICHARD T Attorney for Defendant
Track This PartyMKHITARYAN ASHOT Defendant
Track This PartyMKHITARYAN ASHOT Defendant
Track This PartyMKHITARYAN ASHOT DefendantRespondent
Track This PartyNEMECEK & COLE Former Attorney for Defend…
Track This PartyO'MEARA FRANCES MARY Attorney for Defendant
Track This PartyO'MEARA FRANCES MARY Attorney for Defendant
Track This PartyTABATABAI & MIYAMOTO A… Attorney for Defendant
Track This PartyTABATABAI FARZAD B. ESQ. Attorney for Defendant
Track This PartyTASHJIAN ARMEN Defendant
Track This PartyTASHJIAN ARMEN DefendantRespondent
Track This PartyTASHJIAN ARMEN Defendant
Track This PartyTHOMPSON COE & O'… Attorney for Defendant
Track This PartyTOROSIAN AKOP PlaintiffPetitioner
Track This PartyTOROSIAN AKOP Plaintiff
Track This PartyTOROSIAN AKOP Plaintiff
Track This PartyTOROSIAN JACK Plaintiff
Track This PartyTOROSIAN JACK Pltf's AKA
Track This PartyTOROSIAN JACK PlaintiffPetitioner's…
Track This PartyTOROSIAN ROBERT Plaintiff
Track This PartyTOROSIAN ROBERT Plaintiff
Track This PartyTOROSIAN ROBERT PlaintiffPetitioner
Track This PartyClick on any of the below link(s) to see Register of Action Items on or before the date indicated:
2024-03-08T12:00:00
2023-12-18T12:00:00
2023-10-24T12:00:00
2023-10-23T12:00:00
2023-02-16T12:00:00
2021-08-06T12:00:00
2021-07-30T12:00:00
2021-03-19T12:00:00
2019-11-08T00:00:00
2019-07-26T00:00:00
TEDDY CANNON, AN INDIVIDUAL VS. BELLUM ENTERTAINMENT LLC
ARTURO AGUILAR VS JONATHAN C. ROSEN ET AL.
AMERICAN TOWER ASSET SUB, LLC VS SUNBELT TELEVISION, INC., ET AL.
CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. VS SUN & STARS LIGHTING IN
MICAELA LEYVA VS. KAREN BACA AN INDIVIDUAL
NORA MENDOZA VS. KAREN BACA, AN INDIVIDUAL
DIAHANNA ALLEN VS ORAN BELILLTI, ET AL.
824 TRUEBLUE, LLC VS TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
ADEL TRINIDAD LUZURIAGA VS KURT J KIRCH AND DELMA R KIRCH
CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. VS. SUN & STARS LIGHTING
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
TENTATIVE RULING
Calendar: 6
Date: 4/26/19
Case No: BC 617479
Case Name: Torosian, et al. v. Fitilichyan, et al.
MOTION TO STRIKE
(SLAPP SUIT)
(CCP §425.16)
Moving Party: Defendant Armen Tashjian
Responding Party: Plaintiffs Akop Torosian, Robert Torosian, Marina Fermanyan
and Elda Madatyan
RULING:
Armen Tashjian’s Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Complaint is denied.
The court finds that plaintiffs have sufficiently established pursuant to Flately v. Mauro (2006) 39 Cal.4th 299, that the claims against the moving defendant are not based on protected communications, but on conduct constituting criminal extortion, the illegality of which is conclusively shown by the evidence. Specifically, the evidence submitted shows that the attorney threatened plaintiff Robert Torosian that if a sum of money was not paid, defendants would accuse plaintiff’s brother of criminal activity, would present manufactured witnesses, and that defendant has been investigated and arre