Defendant Harry Kaladjian’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

OBJECTIONS

“In granting or denying a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, the court need rule only on those objections to evidence that it deems material to its disposition of the motion. Objections to evidence that are not ruled on for purposes of the motion shall be preserved for appellate review.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (q).)

OGSI offers many objections to the declaration of Harry Kaladjian, many of which concern evidence not material to this court’s disposition of the motion and which therefore need not be ruled upon. The court rules as follows on objections having some bearing to the issues in the motion: Objections No. 16, 17, 19, 20–31, 34 and 35 are OVERRULED.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A party may move for summary judgment “if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (a).) “[I]f all the evidence subm