Defendants Michael R. Brown and Michael R. Brown, a California Professional Law Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication is DENIED in its entirety.

I. OBJECTIONS

Both parties have filed several objections to the evidence submitted by the other. The court notes that OGSI’s objections fail to comply with California Rules of Court Rule 3.1354(b)(3), which requires that all objections “[q]uote or set forth the objectionable statement or material.” The court rules on the following objections:

OGSI’s Objections:

1. OVERRULED

2. OVERRULED

3. SUSTAINED as to the estimate of the monetary value of the settlement.

4. OVERRULED

5. OVERRULED

6. OVERRULED

Brown’s Objections:

1. OVERRULED

2. OVERRULED

3. SUSTAINED

4. OVERRULED

5.........