Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party
Michelle Williams Court
(Subscribe to View)
May 8, 2017
Los Angeles County, CA
Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction)
CHURCH ASHANTI - Defendant/Respondent
DOES 1 -100 - Defendant/Respondent
JACOBSON & ASSOCIATES - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
OCAMPO JOSE - Plaintiff/Petitioner
SOOFI RABEH M.A. ESQ - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
May 08, 2017
Apr 13, 2017
Feb 03, 2017
Amjad Alamas, Et Al. Vs Uber Technologies, Inc., Et Al.
Rafael David Miranda Vs Andres Contreras Et Al
Stuart L. Gili-Ross Vs United Financial Casualty Company
Rose Taylor Vs Calvin Broadus, Jr
Rami Alkalay Vs Thuyann Ngo Et Al
Beatriz Sandoval, Et Al. Vs Ramandeep Singh, Et Al.
Valeria Denise Bustamontes Vs Avent Group, Inc., A Delaware Corporation
Ana Rosa Rivera Et Al Vs Osterkamp Trucking Inc Et Al
JOSE OCAMPO, Plaintiff vs. ASHANTI CHURCH, et al., Defendants Case No.: BC594590 [TENATATIVE] ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Defendant, Ashanti Church’s attorney of record, Rabeh Doofi/Axis Legal Counsel seeks to be relieved as counsel, contending the Church is not paying fees and there has been an irretrievable breakdown of the attorney-client relationship. Counsel declares he served the moving papers on the Church via personal service. Counsel has filed proof of service of the moving papers on the Church and on Plaintiff. The motion is unopposed and granted. The Court notes that the proof of service indicates the proposed order was served on Plaintiff and the Church. The Court does not, however, have a copy of the proposed order in its file. Counsel must appear at the hearing and provide a copy of the proposed order for signature. The Court notes that the proof of service does not comply with CCP §1013a, w........
Apr 13, 2017
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.