SUBJECT: Motion to compel responses to requests for production
Moving Party: Plaintiff California Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Resp. Party: None
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. The Court imposes sanctions against defendant CDM Corporation in the total amount of $1,410.00.
BACKGROUND:
Plaintiff commenced this action on 9/2/15. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on 1/22/16 against defendants for: (1) conspiracy to violate Cartwright Act; (2) interference with prospective economic advantage; (3) unfair competition; (4) misappropriation of trade secrets; (5) breach of fiduciary duty; (6) RICO violation; and (7) declaratory relief. Plaintiff alleges that CDM improperly sought a secret commission from and threatened retaliation of plaintiff’s potential customers. Plaintiff alleges that CDM made false statements to plaintiff’s suppliers. Plaintiff alleges that this has disrupted plaintiff’s business.
ANALYSIS:
California Code of Civil Procedure requires a response from th
Hearing Date
October 26, 2016
Type
Other Commercial/Business Tort (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUBJECT: Motion to compel responses to requests for production
Moving Party: Plaintiff California Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Resp. Party: None
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. The Court imposes sanctions against defendant CDM Corporation in the total amount of $1,410.00.
BACKGROUND:
Plaintiff commenced this action on 9/2/15. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on 1/22/16 against defendants for: (1) conspiracy to violate Cartwright Act; (2) interference with prospective economic advantage; (3) unfair competition; (4) misappropriation of trade secrets; (5) breach of fiduciary duty; (6) RICO violation; and (7) declaratory relief. Plaintiff alleges that CDM improperly sought a secret commission from and threatened retaliation of plaintiff’s potential customers. Plaintiff alleges that CDM made false statements to plaintiff’s suppliers. Plaintiff alleges that this has disrupted plaintiff’s business.
ANALYSIS:
California Code of Civil Procedure requires a response from th