Cacique, Inc. v. Proctor Industrial Investors, LLC
MOTION FOR AN ORDER AWARDING ACCRUED AND PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES
MOVING PARTY: Defendant/Cross-Complainant Proctor Industrial Investors, LLC
RESPONDING PARTY(S): Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Cacique, Inc.
STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS:
Plaintiff buyer alleges that Defendant seller has breached an agreement for sale of real property by refusing to complete improvements prior to the close of escrow.
Defendant filed a cross-complaint alleging that Plaintiff did not deposit an additional $1,500,000 into escrow as required by the terms of the Agreement once the Contingency Date had passed.
On December 27, 2017, judgment was entered in favor of Defendant/Cross-Complainant. Defendant/Cross-Complainant Proctor Industrial Investors, LLC moves for an order awarding accrued and pre-judgment interest and attorneys’ fees.
TENTATIVE RULING:
Defendant/Cross-Complainant Proctor Industrial Investors, LLC’s motio
Hearing Date
March 16, 2018
Type
Other Real Property Rights Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Cacique, Inc. v. Proctor Industrial Investors, LLC
MOTION FOR AN ORDER AWARDING ACCRUED AND PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES
MOVING PARTY: Defendant/Cross-Complainant Proctor Industrial Investors, LLC
RESPONDING PARTY(S): Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Cacique, Inc.
STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS:
Plaintiff buyer alleges that Defendant seller has breached an agreement for sale of real property by refusing to complete improvements prior to the close of escrow.
Defendant filed a cross-complaint alleging that Plaintiff did not deposit an additional $1,500,000 into escrow as required by the terms of the Agreement once the Contingency Date had passed.
On December 27, 2017, judgment was entered in favor of Defendant/Cross-Complainant. Defendant/Cross-Complainant Proctor Industrial Investors, LLC moves for an order awarding accrued and pre-judgment interest and attorneys’ fees.
TENTATIVE RULING:
Defendant/Cross-Complainant Proctor Industrial Investors, LLC’s motio