SUBJECT: Motion for judgment on the pleadings

Moving Party: Cross-defendant City of Los Angeles (“City”)

Resp. Party: None


The City’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED.

The City’s Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED.


PRELIMINARY COMMENTS:

This Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is unopposed. The Court finds such silence to be troubling. If plaintiffs believed that the motion should be overruled, they should have filed an opposition. If plaintiffs agreed that they have no case or that the cross-complaint needed to be amended, they should have agreed to withdraw or amend the cross-complaint.

The Court can only interpret plaintiffs’ silence as a sub silentio acquiescence to the Court’s dismissal of the cross-complaint.


The Court also notes that the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is directed at all five causes of action against ........