Montero v Glendale Memorial Hospital
MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Calendar: 2
Case No: BC561066
Date: 3/24/17
MP: Defendant, Ryan Lee
RP: Plaintiffs, Dania Montero and Nancy Cerdo
RELIEF REQUESTED:
Summary Adjudication on first and second causes of action
ALLEGATIONS IN FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT:
The Plaintiffs claims that she suffered personal injuries because the Defendants negligently provided medical care during the delivery of Dania Montero.
CAUSES OF ACTION IN FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT:
1) Medical Malpractice
2) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
3) Lack of Informed Consent
DISCUSSION:
Trial is set for August 28, 2017.
This hearing concerns the motion for summary adjudication filed by the Defendant, Ryan Lee. Dr. Lee performed the procedure on the Plaintiffs.
The hearing was continued from January 13, 2017 so that the Plaintiffs could file a supplemental brief to address new arguments and evidence that were raised by the Defendant in its
Hearing Date
March 24, 2017
Type
Med Malpractice (Drs & Surgeons) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Montero v Glendale Memorial Hospital
MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Calendar: 2
Case No: BC561066
Date: 3/24/17
MP: Defendant, Ryan Lee
RP: Plaintiffs, Dania Montero and Nancy Cerdo
RELIEF REQUESTED:
Summary Adjudication on first and second causes of action
ALLEGATIONS IN FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT:
The Plaintiffs claims that she suffered personal injuries because the Defendants negligently provided medical care during the delivery of Dania Montero.
CAUSES OF ACTION IN FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT:
1) Medical Malpractice
2) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
3) Lack of Informed Consent
DISCUSSION:
Trial is set for August 28, 2017.
This hearing concerns the motion for summary adjudication filed by the Defendant, Ryan Lee. Dr. Lee performed the procedure on the Plaintiffs.
The hearing was continued from January 13, 2017 so that the Plaintiffs could file a supplemental brief to address new arguments and evidence that were raised by the Defendant in its