KATIE SIEGEL, Plaintiff vs. OLINSTRISTRAM FLOWERS, ET AL., Defendants
CASE NO: BC557274
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS; DENYING MOTION FOR ISSUE, EVIDENTIARY, OR MONETARY SANCTIONS; ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH ALL DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS WITHIN FIVE DAYS
Defendant propounded form interrogatories and RPDs on Plaintiff on 6/08/16. On 3/24/17, the Court granted Defendant’s unopposed motions to compel responses to form interrogatories and RPDs, and ordered Plaintiff to serve responses, without objections, within ten days. Defendant did not seek imposition of monetary sanctions, and none were imposed.
On 4/14/17, Defendant filed the instant motion for terminating sanctions. In the alternative, Defendant seeks issue or evidentiary sanctions and/or monetary sanctions. Defendant contends no responses were served, and therefore sanctions should be imposed.
On 5/12/17, Plaintiff filed timely opposition to the motion. She provides evidence that she served resp
Hearing Date
May 26, 2017
Type
Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
KATIE SIEGEL, Plaintiff vs. OLINSTRISTRAM FLOWERS, ET AL., Defendants
CASE NO: BC557274
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS; DENYING MOTION FOR ISSUE, EVIDENTIARY, OR MONETARY SANCTIONS; ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH ALL DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS WITHIN FIVE DAYS
Defendant propounded form interrogatories and RPDs on Plaintiff on 6/08/16. On 3/24/17, the Court granted Defendant’s unopposed motions to compel responses to form interrogatories and RPDs, and ordered Plaintiff to serve responses, without objections, within ten days. Defendant did not seek imposition of monetary sanctions, and none were imposed.
On 4/14/17, Defendant filed the instant motion for terminating sanctions. In the alternative, Defendant seeks issue or evidentiary sanctions and/or monetary sanctions. Defendant contends no responses were served, and therefore sanctions should be imposed.
On 5/12/17, Plaintiff filed timely opposition to the motion. She provides evidence that she served resp